Here's what REALLY happens with International Students in the UK

All that you may have heard about educational excellence in the UK is a sham, a huge lie and a cover-up. Here's why. First, Asian students face a lot of racism in the UK, mostly in Universities and by faculty members. Then, once your course is over, there are no jobs anywhere in the UK. On top of all this, EVERYTHING you do, say and write is monitored. EVERYTHING.
And why? I wish I knew. But it may be because the UK is fast turning into a totalitarian police state. The govt. wants all 'foreigners', 'troublesome immigrants' and 'stinking Asians' sent back to 'whichever hellhole they came from'. May be this is what Brexit was all about. Keep the numbers down, keep the 'troublesome Asians' out, keep the Leavers believing in the greatness of an illusion, keep the locals antagonistic towards 'immigrants', because if they have too much free time to think, they will see through the ancient deception that is the elite's plan of enslaving humanity by ALL means possible. Brilliant!

My journalism course began in September 2016. I was asked to be present at the University by September 9, but even by end of September, there had been no regular classes. Just welcome lectures, orientation, introduction to the faculty and so on.

THE USUAL SUSPECTS: SEXISM, RACISM
When the classes finally began, we were assigned two elderly lecturers. One of them was a racist pervert who skipped no opportunity to call me "old" (i am 38) and to humiliate me and two other Indian students on everything she thought was "dirty" and "backward" about India. An example: One Indian student (not me) wanted to explore the educational system in the UK. She rejected his story idea and replied thus: "This is not India, where you sit on the floor and write with chalk and slate."
The other used to openly flirt with a student, even going to the extent of saying to her in front of the entire class, "I think I'm in love!" He was in his 60s. The petite student had long blond hair and was in the flush of youth, being in her early 20s :-) "It happens." (?!)

NO JOBS and only because of your Nationality
Recent graduates of UK universities end up working at supermarkets or retail stores as customer sales agents, even if their course was an MBA. The same applies to other industries/job sectors. Even AMERICAN citizens cannot find jobs in the UK! Now you can imagine what little chance Indian students have of landing a job in the UK after spending lakhs of rupees paying the exorbitant tuition fees.

24X7 SURVEILLANCE of Students but Terrorists get away
How can I be so sure that international students in the UK are put under heavy surveillance from the moment they set foot on its tarmac? Well, for this, I have to thank my elderly lecturers. I first became suspicious that my hostel accomodation, including my private ensuite room, is bugged, when these two great academics would make passing comments about things I had been discussing with my flatmates in the hostel's common area. This happened atleast 4 times, and was enough! And then I have overheard conversations in which University student 'advisors' are 'advising' students to keep away from 'certain' activities since the 'Home Office will bring it up when it's time to extend your visa'. There are also people following me, ANYWHERE I go. From my one favourite cafe in town to during my travels around England and Scotland, upto the Orkney Islands.
What I want to know is if they treat students with so much suspicion, how is it that 'terrorists' get away from their 'web of surveillance'?
DISCRIMINATION at EVERY STEP
My course was an MA degree in Broadcast Journalism, but looking at the state of faculty, subject expertise, inadequate number of video and audio equipment for students, general tardiness and all-pervasive discrimination bordering on racial abuse, I decided to withdraw from the course. After this, things got more interesting. The lecturer duo became more determined in their pursuit of driving away anyone remotely independent-minded; they scored me on 'final' exams and gave me very poor marks -- in the 50s (out of 100). Even the re-evaluation results came back unaltered, but then, I had not expected anything else. As if all this was not enough, I waited for more than 6 months. for my course certificate (to prove to my bank which loaned me money to pay the tuition fees, that I completed three months of the course and so, I am entitled to an MA Certificate Course in Broadcast Journalism certificate). The University was non-cooperative and said they only send out paper copies and do not hold PDFs of students' certificates. No PDFs! Wonderful.

The not-so Merry Wives, Sisters and Mothers of Southall (and Smethwick)

British-Indian Women & Domestic Violence

Having lived in the UK for a while now, and going to the 'Indian' part of town once too often, there's one question that keeps nagging me: How different are lives of British-Indian women from those of Indian women?

What are their 'options' in terms of sovereignty in life choices, whether it is pursuing a career or not, getting married or staying single, getting a divorce, having a same-sex partner, becoming an entrepreneur? Is the way women are viewed and treated by their families in the UK any different from India? And if there is a difference, how does it fit in with the construct of social life in the UK?

GENERATIONAL SHIFT?

Going back to the beginning, the UK city that I live in, has a whole different 'Indian' area, where most first, second and third generation Indians (the older ones still decidedly-Indian in attire) buy Indian clothes and Indian groceries from Indian-owned business establishments. In fact, when I first went there, it took me a while to orient myself; it was almost as if the chaos of Delhi's Karol Bagh or Mumbai's D.N. Road had been replicated in this green and perennially-misty land ! So complete was the mind-boggling 'operation' of moving Indians and Indian quirks to the UK, lock, stock and two spicy biryani barrels, that it took me one full day to recover from 'British-Indian' accents and heavily made-up Indian women, who all looked the same.

The critical question is what lies behind the dainty white lace curtains of insulated windows in neatly laid-out British-Indian homes? Is the reality of life for Indian-origin families here revealed by and limited to the cultural spectrum offered by movies such as Bend it Like Beckham and Provoked: A True Story? Is honour killing and honour-based abuse as rampant today as it was in the 80s and 90s? Are Indian-origin men here just as intrusive, abusive and sexually-deviant, both in public spaces and within four walls, as they are notorious for being in India? Is there more to the story than violence, abuse and coercion in the name of family values, religious traditions and cultural affinity?

THE MORE THINGS CHANGE….

I met Raheema (not her real name) at a University event. During lunch break, we got talking about the Tamil Nadu village her family belonged to and how she loved visiting India, especially the Marina Beach in Chennai. "My husband used to give me £50 per week for household expenses. The rest of his salary went to his family in India. Then one day, during an argument, he hit me with a broom and then slapped me. I had to divorce him after that," she told me. Despite her best efforts, tears welled up in her eyes. Raheema is a second generation British-Indian, and is Indian only in attire. An intelligent middle-aged woman, with a successful career, she was fortunate enough to be able to divorce an abusive husband who arrived in the UK on a spouse visa and then brought along several of his family members, paying for their living expenses on priority while sidelining and being abusive toward his wife.

Mindy Chawla (not her real name) was born in the UK to a second generation British-Indian father; her mother arrived here from India post-marriage. Mindy is quite the party animal, clubbing and dining out atleast twice a week. Her active sex life and scores of like-minded friends keep her social calendar full, and she is as independent in life choices as any British-Indian woman would want to be. She faces other problems, though. "My family reported my 'social drinking' to my GP, who then put me on this programme of mental health counselling. I told the GP I was not an alcoholic but only drank on and off, on social occasions. He just did not get it and it left me so frustrated !" she says.

APATHY AND IMPUNITY

When this writer went to meet a representative of Birmingham and Solihull Women’s Aid (BSWA), she was asked to email questions to Sally Dennis of BSWA. Sally could not reply but Nasheima Shaikh, Assistant Chief Executive at BSWA wrote back saying, "I am afraid we do not have the capacity to do this (answer questions) presently."

With regard to official statistics on Domestic Violence in the UK, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) gave this reply on its website to a question on the ethnicity of victims of domestic violence in the UK: “The exact information on the number of victims of domestic violence by UK area that you require is not available…”

In their study on Indian-origin victims of domestic violence across the world, researchers Sundari Anitha, Anupama Roy, Harshita Yalamarty, Nalini Trivedi and Anjali Chahal spoke to 57 women who had faced abuse. Twenty-eight of the 57 women interviewed for this research had been married to men resident in the UK, eight of the husbands were from Italy, four each from Australia and USA, with smaller numbers from other countries.

Titled “Disposable Women: Abuse, Violence and Abandonment in Transnational Marriages (Issues for Policy and Practice in the UK and India)”, this study was conducted between December 2013 and May 2015 in the Indian states of Delhi, Punjab and Gujarat, which have a long history of out-migration to the UK and other countries in the West.

“The majority of the women reported that they had experienced physical violence perpetrated by their husband, in-laws or both. All the women were subjected to coercive control, isolation and financial abuse. A third of the research participants disclosed sexual abuse perpetrated by their husband, while just under a quarter disclosed sexual abuse by male in-laws. A fifth of the research participants had been coerced into undergoing abortion(s). A majority of the women who experienced sexual abuse indicated that our interview was the first time they had disclosed this abuse,” the study states.

It goes on to say, “Socio-cultural norms against divorce compelled women to remain in abusive relationships. Insecure immigration status prevented marriage migrants from seeking help. The findings suggest that cultural practices like dowry, son preference, and dominant social norms which make for patriarchal control and devaluation of women played an important role in the violence and abandonment that ensued in all marriages,” which makes one wonder if there really is ANY difference at all between the status of Indian women in the UK and those in India.

The demographic characteristics of the women and statistics relating to the nature of domestic abuse they experienced are as follows:

 

Age             Number of women           Percentage                           

18-24                      6                                   11%

25-34                    30                                   53%

35-44                    18                                   32%

45-54                      3                                     5%

Religion

Hindu                    36                                    63%

Sikh                      19                                    33%

Muslim                  1                                        2%

Christian               1                                        2%

Type of marriage

Arranged by family     53                               92%

Love/self choice           4                                 8%

Number of children

None                          38                                67%

One                            16                                28%

Two                              3                                  6%

Domestic Abuse

Walked out of the marriage   13                        23%

Forced out of in-laws’/husband’s home  44       77%

Financial abuse

Dowry demanded/given to in-laws      57              100%

Dowry related violence/harassment    39              68%

Appropriation of wages        7                                   14%

Abuse related to domestic labour      56                  98%

Physical abuse

Violence from husband only          15                           26%

Violence from in-laws only             11                              19%

Violence from both                         16                                          28%

Denial of food and medicine           27                           47%

Psychological abuse

Verbal abuse                                  53                                                   93%

Coercive control/intimidation          57                          100%

Isolation                                          56                                                            98%

Sexual abuse and denial of reproductive rights

Sexual abuse from husband only    18                     32%

Sexual abuse from in-laws only       13                        23%

Forced abortion                                11                                                 19%

Post-abandonment actions

Reported to police                            53                                             93%

Recovered dowry                               3                                                  5%

Obtained financial compensation       4                          7%

Percentages are rounded off

SOURCE: Disposable Women: Abuse, Violence and Abandonment in Transnational Marriages (Issues for Policy and Practice in the UK and India)

Lessons Learnt? Prevent 'Natural' Disasters through Early Education Initiatives

Scenes from an apocalyptic nightmare have become quite common in India.

Sometimes there are visuals of large-scale flooding, gushing waters breaching bunds and inundating everything in sight --- from schools to offices and homes to hospitals; at other times, there are heart-rending images of crumbled houses and cities razed to the ground by earthquakes. 

Cyclones, floods, droughts, earthquakes and other natural disasters are occurring with alarming regularity in India. Be it the Kashmir floods of 2014 or the devastating Uttarakhand earthquake a few decades ago, devastation seems par for the course as human population increases exponentially and resources are drained like never before in history.

And although we like to term them ‘natural’ disasters, the fact is most of these calamities are caused due to and exacerbated by human activities. As far back as October 2001, a study by the Worldwatch Institute, a Washington D.C.-based environmental research organisation had found, “More people worldwide are now displaced by natural disasters than by conflict. In the 1990s, natural catastrophes like hurricanes, floods, and fires affected more than two billion people and caused in excess of $608 billion in economic losses worldwide -- a loss greater than during the previous four decades combined. But more and more of the devastation wrought by such natural disasters is “unnatural” in origin, caused by ecologically destructive practices and an increasing number of people living in harm's way.”

According to National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) statistics, in June 2013, there were 4,094 fatalities in the mountainous states of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh due to landslides and floods. Similarly, in 2008, the state of Bihar recorded 527 deaths, with 19,323 livestock perishing, and 2,23,000 houses suffering damage, leaving a total number of 3.3 million persons affected. Data on the NDMA website goes back to 1977, when in the coastal state of Andhra Pradesh, a cyclone left in its wake 10,000 humans fatalities, 40,000 livestock dead and thousands of people homeless.

All this leaves us wondering if preventive action can reduce the impact of disaster events (not limited to ‘natural’ disasters). The main reasons why natural calamities turn into large-scale disasters are unchecked and unplanned construction activity, blocked drainage vents (both along rivers and in residential areas), unawareness about impending calamitous events, faulty public warning systems and sometimes, plain callousness in giving advance warning of potential disaster situations.

Sunita Narain of the Centre for Science and Environment had termed the 2013 Uttarakhand flooding a ‘man-made disaster’. Contending that development must account for terrain and ecological-sensitivity, Narain had told The Hindu newspaper, “We cannot have roads on the Himalayas like the ones on the Alps. The Himalayas are young mountains… we need to look at ways of development without destroying natural resources.”

The next logical question is why do we keep repeating the same mistakes while commissioning/planning new construction activities, especially in eco-sensitive areas with high risk of disaster? The answer could lie in (a) a lack of awareness and (b) an indifference towards long-term impact of ‘development’ activities.

Consequently, the most comprehensive effort at disaster mitigation will, logically, have to begin at the educational level. When knowledge of the catastrophic impact of human activities is ingrained into young citizens from an early age, its effects pass over to their families and from there to entire communities in a kind of positive ‘domino effect’.

The Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, 2016, published under the aegis of UNESCO, states much the same with its enhanced focus on the inter-relation between climate change--natural disasters--education systems.

The GEM Report states: “Climate change and natural disasters severely affect education systems and outcomes. The growing frequency of natural disasters and extreme weather increases the vulnerability of many low income countries, and such events have multiple direct and indirect effects on education systems and outcomes.”

The report mentions how the challenge of climate change demonstrates the complexity of, and urgent need for, using education to address environmental crises. “All three approaches...are required: learning at schools, in communities and through lifelong learning, along with integration between types of education and collaboration between education and other sectors. Thus deployed, education can contribute to actions to address climate change, including prevention, mitigation and disaster preparedness.”

By conservative estimates, between 1995 and 2014, 15,000 extreme weather events caused more than 5,25,000 deaths worldwide and losses of nearly US$3 trillion. A 2012 report by the Washington D.C.-based Brookings Institution has highlighted how the effects of climate change have serious implications for the functioning of education systems, and require adaptive strategies.

In September 2012, the Global Partnership for Education, the United Nations Children’s Fund and Save the Children put forward a proposition for better aid for education in emergencies. “The Global Partnership for Education, the United Nations Children’s Fund and Save the Children put forward a proposition for better aid for education in emergencies,” reads the Brookings Institution report. “The Call to Action, endorsed by leaders from governments, international organisations and civil society at the U.N. General Assembly, calls for education to be integrated into Humanitarian Action Plans, and for education systems everywhere to incorporate emergency prevention, preparedness, response and recovery,” the report states further.

With the average number of natural disasters expected to increase by 320 percent over the course of the next 20 years, schools could become avenues to provide knowledge and skills that the next generation will need to respond to disaster. It would not be an exaggeration to say that better education, leading to greater knowledge of occurrence and prevention of disaster events, could potentially reduce the fatalities and losses incurred from such events.

Finding Benjamin Zephaniah: All in a decade's work

PUNE, INDIA, 2006-07: When I last spoke to Benjamin Zephaniah, it was in Pune's Koregaon Park. A rookie journalist then, I had to meet what my editor called "this famous writer/poet from England". It was one of my few 'big' interviews till then and I went in the hope it will be carried half-page on or next to the Op-Ed page.

Benjamin Zephaniah spoke of many things that day and it was a memorable  conversation. Post that interaction, a lot more than just my journalistic greed had been addressed. I had the op-ed piece and I would get the half-page coverage!

But what I did not tell anyone, and dared not admit to myself, was how the interview had turned my entire worldview (if a 26-yr-old has a well-threshed-out worldview in the first place) upside down. So much that did not make sense about this world -- its politics, its violence and wars, its hurtling down a cul-de-sac way of living, its treatment of nature and of people, and a lot more -- began appearing to me for what it really was -- a sham, a trap, a scam, all dressed up in Moulin Rouge gaudiness.

BIRMINGHAM, UK, JANUARY 2017: Nearly a decade past that interaction, it was time for another conversation, this time over the phone. In October 2016, Britain's second city had played host to the Birmingham Literature Festival and slotted Benjamin's session at 8.30 pm! Unable to attend and regretting it, I finally managed to track down the elusive writer who was now also a Professor, through persistent emails.

After having spent the first few days of the New Year amid the verdant greens and Arthurian atmosphere of Somerset and finding myself back in the industrial moodiness and Brutalist architecture of Birmingham, I missed the peace and calm that only nature and deep reflection affords. But a conversation with Benjamin Zephaniah always leaves your mind whirring happily. This time, we spoke of Black Lives Matter, spirituality of the Indian variety and what it means to say no to an OBE while still living in Britain...!

A patient listener, almost intuitive, Benjamin talked of unreported police brutality towards detainees in the UK and how his cousin had died after being run down and gassed by police. This becomes especially poignant in light of what passes for 'acceptable' behaviour by law enforcement officials, particularly towards women, minorities and special needs citizens. "All lives matter. That there is a conversation about Black lives is a welcome development," says the poet who seems like a modern-day version of Bob Marley, with both dreadlocks and piercing gaze in place. "What is rarely reported is how many people are killed in police custody, while being thrashed in the back of the police van on way to the police station," he adds. "Over the past 30 years, more than 1,000 people have died in Britain in police custody. In that time, only two officers have been convicted as a result," the poet-professor had written in this Guardian piece.

Often taken for a sadhu in India, Benjamin reminisces his experiences of reading poetry in India. "It takes me double the time to read the same poems in India than in Britain, because the audience laughs at every line," he says as we veer from the topic of police brutality towards the pleasanter aspect of Indian spirituality. Ever the dissenter, I ask him if Indian-brand spiritualism is grossly overrated. "There can be no generalisations; there are some things that are good, like Yoga and mindful living. And then there is the caste system and one wonders how does that work?"

Speaking of wonderment, among the many manys, what really left me agape was Benjamin's no -- in November 2003 -- to an OBE. Writing in The Guardian about why he was turning it down, he had said, "I've never heard of a holder of the OBE openly criticising the monarchy. They are officially friends, and that's what this cool Britannia project is about. It gives OBEs to cool rock stars, successful businesswomen and blacks who would be militant in order to give the impression that it is inclusive. Then these rock stars, successful women, and ex-militants write to me with the OBE after their name as if I should be impressed. I'm not. Quite the opposite - you've been had."

Did he not fear a backlash, given that he continued to live in Britain after refusing an award many would pay billions (atleast) for, I asked Benjamin. "One of my friends did write a piece criticising my decision. But there was no way I could have accepted it. You have to be very clear about what you want."

And so went a conversation that had begun nearly a decade ago, and still remains incomplete. One line has stayed with me though and is quite the talisman in these tumultuous times, not least because it comes from a former borstal resident who writes and teaches poetry and is vegan in a world gone mad from killing animals for food and destroying nature for greed.

"You have to be very clear about what you want."